KESENJANGAN PEMBELAJARAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN ALAM DAN SOSIAL DALAM PENDIDIKAN MITIGASI BENCANA DI SEKOLAH DASAR PADA ERA DIGITAL

Rudi Ritonga, Sulistyani Puteri Ramadhani, Winda Amelia, Umar Alfaruq

Abstract


Learning Natural and Social Sciences in elementary schools plays a strategic role in developing students' holistic understanding of natural and social phenomena, including in the context of disaster mitigation education. However, the implementation of Natural And Social Sciences learning in the digital era still faces various gaps that have the potential to hinder students' optimal achievement of disaster mitigation competencies. This study aims to comprehensively examine the gaps in Natural And Social Sciences learning in disaster mitigation education in elementary schools in the digital era. This research used a qualitative approach with a systematic literature study design enriched by conceptual analysis. Data were obtained from reputable scientific articles published between 2018 and 2022 and accessed through the Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify patterns and dimensions of gaps in Natural And Social Sciences learning in the context of disaster mitigation education. The results indicate that gaps in Natural And Social Sciences learning consistently emerge across four main dimensions: curriculum, pedagogy, digital technology utilization, and student mitigation competencies. The largest gap was found in the dimension of digital technology utilization, which is still dominated by the use of technology as a medium for information delivery, followed by gaps in students' mitigation competencies, pedagogical approaches, and curriculum. These findings indicate that although the curriculum provides space for the integration of disaster mitigation education, the implementation of science and natural sciences learning has not fully supported meaningful, contextual learning oriented toward the formation of mitigation behaviors. This study concludes that the gap in science and natural sciences learning in disaster mitigation education stems not only from the curriculum but is more influenced by the weak integration between pedagogy, digital technology, and the disaster context. Therefore, it is necessary to develop inquiry-based science and natural sciences learning integrated with digital technology and the local disaster context to strengthen mitigation competencies and environmental awareness in elementary school students in the digital era.


Keywords


elementary school science and natural sciences; disaster mitigation education; learning gap; digital learning; inquiry learning.

Full Text:

PDF

References


BNPB. (2020). Indeks risiko bencana Indonesia. Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana.https://inarisk.bnpb.go.id

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352.https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769237

English, L. D., & Watson, J. M. (2018). Development of critical thinking through inquiry-based learning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30(4), 411–430.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0232-x

Gillies, R. M. (2020). Dialogic approaches to teaching and learning. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 1–29.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09528-4

Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217.https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1398

Izadkhah, Y. O., & Hosseini, M. (2019). Disaster preparedness education: An overview. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 34, 146–152.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.012

Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Brereton, O. P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., & Linkman, S. (2020). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering: A tertiary study. Information and Software Technology, 122, 106299.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106299

Kimmons, R., Graham, C. R., & West, R. E. (2020). The influence of technology on pedagogy and learning design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 1–23.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09712-3

Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychology Review, 32, 1–24.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09517-3

OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264306780-en

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2020). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 29, 100304.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100304

Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2020). The importance of attitudes toward technology for technology integration. Computers & Education, 149, 103807.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103807

Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations. OECD Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1787/19963777

Shiwaku, K., Sakurai, A., & Shaw, R. (2020). Disaster education and resilience: Lessons from research and practice. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 47, 101530.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101530

UNDRR. (2019). Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction. United Nations.https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210041804

UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. Paris: UNESCO.https://doi.org/10.54675/YTCS8753

Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., & van Braak, J. (2019). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A review of the literature. Journal of




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31326/jipgsd.v6i2.2654

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.